The non-import agreements of the late colonial era were important precursors of the American Revolution. The agreements have stoked tensions that have led to violence. The negotiation of the agreements propelled the Boston Patriots to the forefront and demonstrated to the settlers the potential for unified action. At a deeper level, the agreements have helped awaken settlers to their emerging national identity as Americans, helping them promote their cultural value of austerity on the national stage. In response to the non-import Boston agreement, Parliament finally struck down the Townshend Revenue Act taxes on all products except tea. The non-import agreements of the years leading up to the American Revolution were an effective tactic to protest British policy and put the Boston Patriots first and demonstrate to other colonies the potential for joint action. Following the successful boycott that Boston launched in 1768 with the Boston non-Import Agreement, the First Continental Congress of 1774 would pass a colonial ban on all trade with Great Britain. NONIMPORTATION AGREEMENTS were a series of trade restrictions introduced by American settlers to protest british income policy before the American Revolution. The British Stamp Act of 1765 triggered the first non-import agreements. In protest at the unrepresentation tax, New York merchants agreed to a collective embargo on British imports until Parliament lifted stamp duty, and they persuaded traders in Boston and Philadelphia to do the same. Under pressure from British exporters who lost their business, Parliament repealed the Stamp Act within a year. What made you look for non-import? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible).
The non-import agreements (1765-1775) in American colonial history attempted to impose British recognition of political rights by applying economic pressure. In response to the Stamp Act (1765) and the Townshend Acts (1767), non-importing colonial associations of Sons of Liberty and Whig were created to boycott English products. In any event, British traders and producers suffered from a restriction of trade with the colonies and exerted the expected pressure on Parliament. When the acts were cancelled, the boycotts collapsed. After the unbearable laws of 1774, the first continental congress immediately set up non-exporting and non-exporting commissions. However, Britain had opened up new markets in Europe and the expected influence on Parliament did not take place. For ten years, non-importation was the main weapon used by the settlers in their unsuccessful attempt to obtain their claims from the metropolis by peaceful means. The impact of the Boston non-import agreement and all similar agreements has been considerable. About 60 merchants and merchants signed the agreement on August 1, 1768, and within two weeks, all but sixteen Boston merchants, merchants and business owners had joined the boycott. Boston craftsmen, craftsmen and other merchants signed the agreement with joy in the hope that the boycott would generate business for them. In the space of weeks and months, almost all ports and regions of the Thirteen Colonies adopted similar boycotts to protest and undermine the Townshend Revenue Act, although many merchants and traders in the South with loyalist tendencies refused to cooperate.